Thompson, Carlyle Marsden, Gordon Ray Church, and all the other bright souls who did not survive Mormonism's homophobia. And to those of us who have survived, that we might bear witness In doing so, it became apparent to me that Mormon women found that the intensity of female homosociality  available in Mormon structures created a vital space in which they could explore passionate, romantic relationships with each other.
The law is as it has been for plus years, and so the burden is on them to make the persuasive case as to why they should be married, not just for their benefit but for what the impact is on society and marriage as a whole, and on children.
Many rejoiced after the U.S. Supreme Court legalized same-same marriage nationally in late June. Others jeered. But whatever a person’s take on the Court’s ruling, Americans at this historical moment need to think about what, if anything, comes next for marriage. The Man Who Taught Donald Trump To Pit Gay People Against Immigrants. Geert Wilders spent years arguing that Islam threatened gay rights in the country that gave marriage equality to the world. Descriptions of common fallacies. Dr. Michael C. Labossiere, the author of a Macintosh tutorial named Fallacy Tutorial Pro , has kindly agreed to allow the text of .
I would argue that the gay community has not made the argument. They may have made the argument as to why they want it, but they have not made any arguments as to why this is beneficial for society.
They have no studies. They have no information whatsoever about what it would do to the moral ecology of the country, what it would do to religious liberty, what it would do to the mental and physical health of children — nothing.
I have a book that was written a few years ago called It Takes a Family. Yet when it comes to something that I happen to believe is actually more important than a particular plot of land — the entire moral ecology of our country, who we are as a people, what we stand for, what we teach our children, what our values and ethics are — people argue that we can build the equivalent of a strip mall without even thinking about what those consequences are.
Does that attitude allay any of your fears? They want the convenient accelerator of the courts to put this in play, and then they want the judicious temperament of the American democratic system to govern it. Same-sex marriage advocates are not going to state legislatures, except in some cases for civil unions.
They are using the courts. If the courts are going to be your accelerator, then get ready for a ride. Another argument made by gay rights advocates is that with or without marriage, gay families are already a widespread reality.
They point out that we already have gay couples living together, some with children. The answer is no — because of the consequences to society as a whole.
And again, those are consequences that they choose to ignore. And also from my perspective, you devalue what you want to value, which is a man and woman in marriage with a child or children. And when you devalue that, you get less of it. When you get less of it, society as a whole suffers.
Do you feel confident that if same-sex marriage became the norm in our society that we would get less traditional marriage? The answer is yes, because marriage then becomes, to some degree, meaningless. I mean, if anybody can get married for any reason, then it loses its special place.
The institution of marriage is already under assault. So why should we do more to discredit it and harm it? Stanley Kurtz of the Ethics and Public Policy Center has written extensively about this, about what the impact is in countries that have adopted same-sex marriage.
We have, in fact, seen a decline in the number of marriages, a delay in people getting married, more children being born out of wedlock and higher rates of divorce.
None of those things are good for society. None of those things are good for children. But can you lay these changes at the feet of same-sex marriage?
Yes, I think you can lay them at its feet. Kurtz notes that the marriage rate in the Netherlands was always actually one of the lowest in the EU. And once same-sex marriage was put in place, it broke below the line.
As a person who has positioned himself as a defender of Christian values, why is gay marriage particularly opposed to those values?
Well, the laws in this country are built upon a certain worldview, and it is the Judeo-Christian worldview. And that worldview has been expressed in our laws on marriage for plus years. Up until 25 years ago, we would never have sat here and done this interview. It would have been beyond the pale.Gay marriage lowers the status of women.
Men and women serve equally important roles in a society. Stating that a man can do a woman's nurturing job is the ultimate insult to women. The same argument for gay marriage can be applied to significantly worse marriage arrangements, such as incestual.
Nov 08, · The debate over same-sex marriage in the United States is a contentious one, and advocates on both sides continue to work hard to make their voices heard.
To explore the case for gay marriage, the Pew Forum has turned to Jonathan Rauch, a columnist at The National Journal and guest scholar at The.
Argumentum Consensus Gentium. See Appeal to Traditional Wisdom.. Availability Heuristic.
We have an unfortunate instinct to base an important decision on an easily recalled, dramatic example, even though we know the example is atypical. Your source for local news, sports, high school sports and weather in and around Jefferson City, Columbia, Fulton and the Lake of the Ozarks.
All of Mid-Missouri. Mar 21, · How to argue against same-sex marriage The arguments against same-sex marriage seem counter-intuitive to the culture in which we live, and those who stick their head above the parapet to argue.
Thus, gay activists who argue that same-sex civil marriage will domesticate gay men are, in all likelihood, clinging to a foolish hope. This foolish hope does not justify yet another effort to meddle with marriage.